TTMUA Lab
TMUA 2019 · Paper 2 · Question 6 of 20

TMUA 2019 Paper 2 Question 6

Proof and counterexample — Finding the error in a trigonometric argument. Try it first; the answer and a full worked solution are below.

TMUA 2019 · Paper 2Proof and counterexampleFinding the error in a trigonometric argument7 options
A student attempts to solve the equation cosx+sinxtanx= 2sinx 1 in the range 0 x 2π.

The student's attempt is as follows:

cosx+sinxtanx= 2 sinx 1

So  cosxsinx+sinxtanxsinx=1   (I)

So  (sinxcosx)(tanx 1)=1   (II)

So  sinxcosx=1  or  tanx 1 =1   (III)

So  (sinxcosx)2= 1  or  tanx= 0   (IV)

So  2sinxcosx= 0  or  tanx= 0   (V)

So  x= 0, π2, π, 3π2, 2π   (VI)

Which of the following best describes this attempt?

  1. AIt is completely correct.
  2. BIt is incorrect, and the first error occurs on line (I)
  3. CIt is incorrect, and the first error occurs on line (II)
  4. DIt is incorrect, and the first error occurs on line (III)
  5. EIt is incorrect, and the first error is that extra solutions were introduced on line (IV)
  6. FIt is incorrect, and the first error is that extra solutions were introduced on line (V)
  7. GIt is incorrect, and the first error is not eliminating the values where tanx is undefined on line (VI)
Show the answer and worked solution
answer · D
  1. AIt is completely correct.
  2. BIt is incorrect, and the first error occurs on line (I)
  3. CIt is incorrect, and the first error occurs on line (II)
  4. DIt is incorrect, and the first error occurs on line (III)
  5. EIt is incorrect, and the first error is that extra solutions were introduced on line (IV)
  6. FIt is incorrect, and the first error is that extra solutions were introduced on line (V)
  7. GIt is incorrect, and the first error is not eliminating the values where tanx is undefined on line (VI)
Check the first two lines by expanding rather than by eye. Line (I) is just 2sinx taken across as sinxsinx, so it is fine. For line (II), (sinxcosx)(tanx 1)=sinxtanxsinxcosxtanx+cosx, and cosxtanx=sinx, giving exactly the left-hand side of (I). Line (III) is where it breaks: from a product equal to 1 you cannot conclude that one factor is 1, because two numbers can multiply to 1 without either being 1 (the split-into-cases move only works when the product is 0).